We spent some time last evening in a Zoom meeting with folks interested in Minnesota's food system and the need for more healthy soils. If you read this blog at all regularly, you may have noticed we have major reservations about subsidizing farmers for the provision of ecosystem services. In large part that's because we're biased toward the "polluter pays principle," and because we've seen little public good provided by the existing agricultural subsidy system. We also acknowledge that what we currently have is an unmitigated failure at providing accessible, healthy, tasty, substantially local food for most of us.
As we frequently do when faced with an unsatisfactory situation, we've been poking around to see if we can find examples that we think offer better options. Today, we found what, at first glance, looks like a major step forward in addressing food and agriculture and related factors. The fact that it's regionally based and we have a long-standing bias toward regional systems as solutions doesn't hurt. Please, if you're interested in Minnesota's ability to provide food sovereignty and security for its residents, take some time to scan through:
Building Bioregional Food Systems Post-COVID 19: The Northeast Healthy Soil Network & the power of regional food system reform consortium work
Our Real Work
It may be that when we no longer know what to do
we have come to our real work,
and that when we no longer know which way to go
we have come to our real journey.
The mind that is not baffled is not employed.
The impeded stream is the one that sings.
********************************************
Thanks for visiting. Come again when you can.
Please be kind to each other while you can.
No comments:
Post a Comment