About five years ago I bought a book and began to read it. For reasons I don’t remember, I got part way into it and put it aside. As I look about the world’s crises, it’s clear I probably should have kept reading. The book’s title? The War On Science, by Shawn Otto. The linked title will take you to a review published in Scientific American, from which we extracted these paragraphs:
Otto grounds his inquiry into current antiscience attitudes by examining their cultural and intellectual roots in, among other things, the anti-Darwinist reaction of the 19th century, the wholesale retreat by many scientists from civic discourse after World War II and the postmodernist movement of the late 20th century.
At times, Otto seems to be criticizing everyone—from academics to industrialists to journalists to politicians. But, despite cogently eviscerating the ultraliberal anti-vaccine element and the “brutal, blame-the-victim aspect of New Age thinking,” he reserves his greatest ire for the “antiscience of those on the right—a coalition of fundamentalist churches and corporations largely in the resource extraction, petrochemical and agrochemical industries.” Their effort, Otto writes, “has far more dangerous public policy implications because it is about forestalling policy based on evidence to protect destructive business models.”
There are several subtitles on the book’s cover
- Who’s Waging It
- Why It Matters
- What We Can Do About It
Science
Then it was the future, though what’s arrivedisn’t what we had in mind, all chrome andcybernetics, when we set up exhibitsin the cafeteria for the judgesto review what we’d made of our hypotheses.The class skeptic (he later refused to signanyone’s yearbook, calling it a sentimentaldegradation of language) chloroformed mice,weighing the bodies before and afterto catch the weight of the soul,wanting to prove the invisiblereal as a bagful of nails. A girlwho knew it all made cookies from euglena,a one-celled compromise between animal and plant,she had cultured in a flask.We’re smart enough, she concluded,to survive our mistakes, showing photos of farmland,poisoned, gouged, eroded. No one believedhe really had built it when a kid no one knewshowed up with an atom smasher, confirming thatthe tiniest particles could be changedinto something even harder to break.And one whose mother had cancer (hard to admit now,it was me) distilled the tar of cigarettesto paint it on the backs of shaven mice.She wanted to know what it took,a little vial of sure malignancy,to prove a daily intake smallerthan a single aspirin could finishsomething as large as a life. I thought of thisbecause, today, the dusky seaside sparrowbecame extinct. It may never be as famousas the pterodactyl or the dodo,but the last one died today, a residentof Walt Disney World where now its tissue sampleslie frozen, in case someday we learn to cloneone from a few cells. Like those instant dinosaursthat come in a gelatin capsule—just add waterand they inflate. One other thing thisbrings to mind. The euglena girl won first prizeboth for science and, I think, in retrospect, for hope.
********************************************
Thanks for visiting. Come again when you can.
Please be kind to each other while you can.
No comments:
Post a Comment