|would it be responsible to mine near here?|
Photo by J. Harrington
Goodland asserts that there are eight principles to responsible mining:
Principle 1: Social and Environmental Assessment
An objective, skilled assessment team is the starting point to determine the path toward responsible mining.
Principle 2: Transparency vs. Secrecy
No social and environmental assessment should be kept secret from potentially impacted stakeholders.
Principle 3: Acceptance by Stakeholders
If stakeholders don’t want the proposed project, it should not go ahead.
Principle 4: Food Production Trumps Questionable Mining
Mining must not decrease resources in areas of scarce land or water.
Principle 5: Compliance with International Standards
Responsible mining corporations will uphold all international social and environmental agreements.
Principle 6: Prequalification or certification of potential mining permit seekers
The best practice is for all mines to engage in a rigorous independent certification regime, as suggested in the IUCN World Conservation Congress’ Resolution 4.088.
Principle 7: Insurance and Performance Bonds
Insurance and performance bonds, mechanisms to foster compliance with contractual obligations and to improve the quality of results, should become standard in mining.
Principle 8: Royalties, Taxes and Fees
Responsible mining accurately assesses all relevant costs and benefits to ascertain whether the proposed mine will earn a significant net benefit.
We believe that, at best, Minnesota would rate about a gentle person's "C" on the preceding principles. Woodland then proceeds to consider that "Five types of socially or environmentally sensitive areas need special consideration in mining regulations." We are unaware of provisions in Minnesota's mining regulations that create what Goodland refers to as "No-Go Zones for Mining:" (something Minnesota probably needs)
- Indigenous Peoples Reserves:
- Conflict Zones:
- Fragile Watersheds:
- Biodiversity, Habitats, and Wildlands:
- Cultural Property:
|is it responsible to expand a tailings dam upstream of this state park?|
Photo by J. Harrington
We further believe Minnesota, and those who would undertake copper-nickel mining here, would be well served if each mining proposal were reviewed by third party auditors to determine just how responsible the proposed mining project may be. From what we've read so far, we doubt any would pass muster. Read Goodland's paper and the assertions by those proposing to undertake copper-nickel mining. Form your own opinion. We'd sleep much better at night if we were proven in error in our assessments of the status of "responsible mining" in Minnesota.
We Are Not Responsible
We are not responsible for your lost or stolen relatives.We cannot guarantee your safety if you disobey our instructions.We do not endorse the causes or claims of people begging for handouts.We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.Your ticket does not guarantee that we will honor your reservations.In order to facilitate our procedures, please limit your carrying on.Before taking off, please extinguish all smoldering resentments.If you cannot understand English, you will be moved out of the way.In the event of a loss, you’d better look out for yourself.Your insurance was cancelled because we can no longer handleyour frightful claims. Our handlers lost your luggage and weare unable to find the key to your legal case.You were detained for interrogation because you fit the profile.You are not presumed to be innocent if the policehave reason to suspect you are carrying a concealed wallet.It’s not our fault you were born wearing a gang color.It is not our obligation to inform you of your rights.Step aside, please, while our officer inspects your bad attitude.You have no rights we are bound to respect.Please remain calm, or we can’t be held responsiblefor what happens to you.
Thanks for visiting. Come again when you can.
Please be kind to each other while you can.