Showing posts with label CAFO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CAFO. Show all posts

Friday, October 13, 2023

The season is getting chili

Another sign of the changing of the seasons? Today we pick up our penultimate autumn share from the community supported agriculture farm. Here’s what we’ll be collecting:

  • BUTTERCUP SQUASH
  • FAMOSA CABBAGE
  • APPLES
  • CARROTS WITH GREENS
  • BROCCOLI
  • HOT PEPPERS, and
  • KALE

The chilly weather today, plus the hot peppers in the CSA box, reminds me we’re entering chili season. [Note to self: speak to Better Half about upcoming menus.] After next week, we’ll be back to relying on local grocers for any fresh vegetables during the winter. There was an interesting article in The Guardian the other day about the need to rely on “mass agriculture.” It both irritated me in its support for large scale agriculture and helped me realize that, once again, the real world answers to many issues isn’t “either / or,” it’s “both /and.” Unfortunately, much of the corporate, capitalistic, global economy persists in creating mega-markets that will only deal with mega-producers, thereby eliminating smaller, local food webs and making all of US vulnerable to price gouging because of oligarchically controlled markets, much like our problems with pharmaceutical giants.

farm size is critical
farm size is critical
Photo by J. Harrington

There’s also a significant and growing issue associated with mega-farms and confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs): surface and groundwater pollution that’s imposed additional treatment costs on local water supply systems, both public and private. Instances can be found in Iowa, WIsconsin and Minnesota. I’m unsure of other locations, but The Limits to Growth, 30 Year Update, notes the problem is global in scale:

Resources can be renewable, like agricultural soils, or nonrenew- able, like the world’s oil resources. Both have their limits. The most obvious limit on food production is land. Millions of acres of cultivated land are being degraded by processes such as soil erosion and salinization, while the cultivated area remains roughly constant. Higher yields have compensated somewhat for this loss, but yields cannot be expected to increase indefinitely. Per capita grain production peaked in 1985 and has been trending down slowly ever since. Exponential growth has moved the world from land abundance to land scarcity. Within the last 35 years, the limits, especially of areas with the best soils, have been approached.

Another limit to food production is water. In many countries, both developing and developed, current water use is often not sustain- able. In an increasing number of the world’s watersheds, limits have already been reached. In the U.S. the Midwestern Ogalallah aquifer in Kansas is overdrawn by 12 cubic kilometers each year. Its depletion has so far caused 2.46 million acres of farmland to be taken out of cultivation. In an increasing number of the world’s watersheds, limits have already, indisputably, been exceeded. In some of the poorest and richest economies, per capita water withdrawals are going down because of environmental problems, rising costs, or scarcity.

At the rate we’re going, and have already gone, it probably won’t be long until “big ag” gets sued by as many offended folks with the resources to make it a lasting fight as is currently underway with “big oil.” By the time we’re through, subsistence agriculture may be the only option for the remaining population. That’s also a chilling thought.


Photosynthesis 

When I was young, my father taught us
how dirt made way for food,
how to turn over soil so it would hold a seed,
an infant bud, how the dark could nurse it
until it broke its green arms out to touch the sun.
In every backyard we’ve ever had, he made a little garden plot
with room for heirloom tomatoes, corn, carrots, 
peppers: jalapeno, bell, and poblano—
okra, eggplant, lemons, collards, broccoli, pole beans,
watermelon, squash, trees filled with fruit and nuts,
brussels sprouts, herbs: basil, mint, parsley, rosemary—
onions, sweet potatoes, cucumber, cantaloupe, cabbage, 
oranges, swiss chard and peaches,
sunflowers tall and straightbacked as soldiers,
lantana, amaryllis, echinacea, 
pansies and roses and bushes bubbling with hydrangeas. 
Every plant with its purpose.
Flowers to bring worms and wasps. How their work matters here. 

This is the work we have always known,
pulling food and flowers from a pile of earth.
The difference, now: my father is not a slave,
not a sharecropper. This land is his and so is this garden,
so is this work. The difference is that he owns this labor.
The work of his own hands for his own belly, 
for his own children’s bellies. We eat because he works. 

This is the legacy of his grandmother, my great-granny.
Ollie Mae Harris and her untouchable flower garden.
Just like her hats, her flowerbeds sprouted something special,
plants and colors the neighbors could only dream of.
He was young when he learned that this beauty is built on work,
the cows and the factories in their stomachs, 
the fertilizer they spewed out—
the stink that brought such fragrance. What you call waste,
I call power. What you call work I make beautiful again.

In his garden, even problems become energy, beauty—
my father has ended many work days in the backyard, 
worries of the firehouse dropping like grain, my father wrist-deep
in soil. I am convinced the earth speaks back to him 
as he feeds it—it is a conversational labor, gardening.
The seeds tell him what they will be, the soil tells seeds how to grow,
my father speaks sun and water into the earth,
we hear him, each harvest, his heartbeat sweet, like fruit. 



********************************************
Thanks for visiting. Come again when you can.
Please be kind to each other while you can.

Thursday, August 24, 2023

“Book ’em Danno"

Remember that phrase from the tv series Hawaii 5-0? I wonder if a Jack Lord recording will be played in Fulton County, GA as an ex-president re-elect wannabe surrenders to be arrested on conspiracy and racketeering charges. I haven’t yet decided whether I care enough to watch. I’m sick of hearing and reading about MAGAts, including the chief one.

our CSA pickup place
our CSA pickup place
Photo by J. Harrington

Sans segue, our community supported agriculture [CSA] farm is behind schedule again this week so we don’t yet know what will be in our share box tomorrow. But, we haven’t yet let you know what was in last week’s box because that message arrived late. So, now we’ll fill you in on what was, and wasn’t, in last week’s share.

  • GARLIC
  • CARROT (missing)
  • YELLOW ONION
  • EGGPLANT
  • TOMATO, and
  • Add ons WATERMELON, Broccoli or carrots  (ours was watermelon)

Tomorrow, as we’ve mentioned already, is the last CSA share of the summer. The Better Half made a delicious moussaka with the egg plant and bacon, lettuce and tomato sandwiches with the tomato(es). We’ll report on tomorrow’s surprise in a posting soon. It’s well understood that part of the package of participating in a CSA is that the members share risk with the farmer(s). That’s why you won’t see me ranting about being short-changed no matter what’s in the weekly box, or even if there is one. Farming is a tough business and we’re interested in helping to build a local food system so we’re not dependent on big boxes, industrial ag, and CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operation). There’s a new farm bill being negotiated. You might want to track what Minnesota’s Land Stewardship Project has to say about it, especially if you enjoy eating regularly.


          Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front

            by Wendell Berry


 

Love the quick profit, the annual raise,

vacation with pay. Want more

of everything ready-made. Be afraid

to know your neighbors and to die.

And you will have a window in your head.

Not even your future will be a mystery

any more. Your mind will be punched in a card

and shut away in a little drawer.

When they want you to buy something

they will call you. When they want you

to die for profit they will let you know.

So, friends, every day do something

that won’t compute. Love the Lord.

Love the world. Work for nothing.

Take all that you have and be poor.

Love someone who does not deserve it.

Denounce the government and embrace

the flag. Hope to live in that free

republic for which it stands.

Give your approval to all you cannot

understand. Praise ignorance, for what man

has not encountered he has not destroyed.

Ask the questions that have no answers.

Invest in the millennium. Plant sequoias.

Say that your main crop is the forest

that you did not plant,

that you will not live to harvest.

Say that the leaves are harvested

when they have rotted into the mold.

Call that profit. Prophesy such returns.

Put your faith in the two inches of humus

that will build under the trees

every thousand years.

Listen to carrion — put your ear

close, and hear the faint chattering

of the songs that are to come.

Expect the end of the world. Laugh.

Laughter is immeasurable. Be joyful

though you have considered all the facts.

So long as women do not go cheap

for power, please women more than men.

Ask yourself: Will this satisfy

a woman satisfied to bear a child?

Will this disturb the sleep

of a woman near to giving birth?

Go with your love to the fields.

Lie easy in the shade. Rest your head

in her lap. Swear allegiance

to what is nighest your thoughts.

As soon as the generals and the politicos

can predict the motions of your mind,

lose it. Leave it as a sign

to mark the false trail, the way

you didn’t go. Be like the fox

who makes more tracks than necessary,

some in the wrong direction.

Practice resurrection.



********************************************
Thanks for visiting. Come again when you can.
Please be kind to each other while you can.

Friday, January 14, 2022

It always seems darkest just before...

If you read these postings with any regularity, you may well have noticed our admiration for the work of Donella Meadows, particularly her authorship of Limits to Growth back in 1972. Subsequent updates were published in 1992 (Beyond the Limits) and 2004 (Limits to Growth: The  30-Year Update). This morning we were both pleasantly surprised to discover someone has again updated the input to the computer models underlying Limits and dismayed by the results found in Update to Limits to Growth: Comparing the World3 Model with Empirical Data

I conducted a data update to Limits to Growth (LtG), best known from the 1972 bestseller that forecasted a scenario of global societal collapse occurring around the present time if humanity did not alter its priorities. Empirical data comparisons since then indicated that the world was still heading for collapse. My objectives were to examine whether this was still the case based on the most recent data, and whether there was opportunity left to change that trajectory. My research benefited from improved data availability, and included a scenario and two variables that had not been part of previous comparisons. I collected data from academia, (non- )government agencies, United Nations entities, and the World Bank. This was plotted along four LtG scenarios spanning a range of technological, resource, and societal assumptions. From these graphs and two quantitative accuracy measures, I found that the scenarios aligned closely with observed global data, which is a testament to the LtG work done decades ago. The two scenarios aligning most closely indicate a halt in growth over the next decade or so, which puts into question the usability of continuous growth as humanity’s goal in the 21st century. Both scenarios also indicate subsequent declines, but only one—the scenario in which declines are caused by pollution, including greenhouse gas pollution—depicts a collapse pattern. The scenario with the smallest declines aligned least with empirical data, however, absolute differences were rarely big and sometimes insignificant. This suggests that it’s almost, but not yet, too late for society to change course.

The Limits to Growth

Might it be that reliance on endless growth on a finite planet isn’t a sustainable course of action? We have a short time to consider that as a way to address climate breakdown and a more widespread economic breakdown. Do we want a soft landing or a hard one? Does this affect whether we vote Blue or Red this year?

To answer the latter question, we suggest you take a look at a recent piece in The Daily Yonder: Q&A: Why is the Government Losing Rural America’s Trust? A pertinent quote from the interview notes:

More recently for white families, they sell under threat of eminent domain when the Fortune 500 Southern Company or the state of Georgia threatens it. In either event, people locally are dispossessed, and you see this over and over again with pipelines and other projects taking away rural people’s capital and centralizing it in corporate coffers.

How can they do this, we might ask? It’s because of the laws on the books at the state level and confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court, that treat energy as synonymous with public good (regardless of who is making the profit from producing it) and likewise privileges the property rights of those entities (i.e. corporations) that can prove they are making the most money (regardless of whether only a handful of executives make most of it).

We would argue that politicians voting in alignment with the interests of corporate persons rather than human beings occurs in both rural and urban districts, more so perhaps with Republicans but Democrats aren’t excluded, although  they are showing an increasingly urban bias in their constituency. We need to find a way to return to government “of, by and for the people,” where money does not equal speech and industrial agriculture does not equal farming.


On Growth


Dressed all in plastic,
which means oil,

we’re bright-eyed, scrambling
for the colored cubes

spilled
on the rug’s polymer.

Inside each 
is a tiny car.

When we can’t unscrew the tops
we cry for help.

We’re optimists.

            *

To sleep is to fall
into belief.

Airing even
our worst suspicions
may be pleasurable;

we are carried,
buoyed.

In sleep,
the body can heal,
grow larger.

Creatures that never wake
can sprout a whole new
limb,

a tail.

This may be wrong.



********************************************
Thanks for visiting. Come again when you can.
Please be kind to each other while you can.

Monday, July 26, 2021

Are our CAFO regs all wet?

During the past several days, we've had a chance to see severe flooding affect parts of China, England and the U.S. Meanwhile, a multitude of wildfires are burning in Canada and the western U.S. It's obvious, if we stop to think about it, that our built environment, and much of our "managed" natural environment, are neither constructed nor operated to minimize the climate and weather related hazards to which we are now exposed.

storms get more intense even in farm country
storms get more intense even in farm country
Photo by J. Harrington

This would be of less concern if we had the slightest idea what should be used for new or improved design standards or building codes. But, if what once was a 1,000 year storm now has a return frequency of a couple of decades, due to increased weather and storm volatility and other climate crisis related factors, when and under what conditions should floodplain identification be modified; setbacks be expanded, pipes and lagoons be oversized, etc.? Shouldn't these kinds of questions be raised and answered before new or expanded confined animal feeding operations [CAFOs] be allowed? The Environmental Working Group, five years or so ago, released a report on North Carolina's "fields of filth." To my knowledge, there hasn't been a comparable evaluation of Minnesota's requirements, despite the growing impacts of climate breakdown. Would we not be better served to have a review before the situation gets much worse? In the climate change world, I believe such  an approach is referred to as adaptation. For most of US it needs to become common sense, especially in the Midwest, where, according to this data, both Minnesota and Iowa rank ahead of North Carolina in hog production.


Frogs Eat Butterflies. Snakes Eat Frogs. Hogs Eat Snakes. Men Eat Hogs.


 - 1879-1955


It is true that the rivers went nosing like swine,
Tugging at banks, until they seemed
Bland belly-sounds in somnolent troughs,

That the air was heavy with the breath of these swine,
The breath of turgid summer, and
Heavy with thunder’s rattapallax,

That the man who erected this cabin, planted
This field, and tended it awhile,
Knew not the quirks of imagery,

That the hours of his indolent, arid days,
Grotesque with this nosing in banks,
This somnolence and rattapallax,

Seemed to suckle themselves on his arid being,
As the swine-like rivers suckled themselves
While they went seaward to the sea-mouths.



********************************************
Thanks for visiting. Come again when you can.
Please be kind to each other while you can.